EU pesticide reforms spark backlash from 27 research institutions

Researchers from 27 European institutions have raised concerns over the EU’s proposed Omnibus Package. They warn it could weaken key safeguards in the pesticide approval process. The group argues the changes may reduce scientific oversight and delay the removal of harmful substances. The package would grant most active substances indefinite approval, removing the need for regular re-evaluations. Since 2011, 59 substances have failed reapproval due to health or environmental risks, showing the importance of these reviews. It would also extend the phase-out period for banned substances to up to three years.

The researchers highlight gaps in the proposal, including the lack of systematic monitoring for pesticide risks after approval. They call for better linking of pesticide usage data to existing monitoring systems and more extensive residue measurements. Without these, targeted follow-up assessments would remain difficult.

Additionally, the package reduces the role of scientific evidence in national product authorisations. The group urges the EU to assign evaluations based on expertise and to standardise assessment criteria. They also stress that approval studies should be made public to allow independent scrutiny. The proposed changes risk weakening incentives for developing safer, more innovative alternatives. Without stronger safeguards, the EU could face greater challenges in managing pesticide risks. The researchers’ warnings underline the need for a more transparent and rigorous approval process.